總網頁瀏覽量

2010年6月14日 星期一

Steven Isserlis and the HKPO under Yan Pascal Tortelier

Saturday night at the Cultural Centre has now become a perpetual delight. Last Saturday was no exception. A famous British cellist and a French conductor appeared with the HKPO for an all French programme by Berlioz, Debussy and Ravel sponsored by the French Government as part of the promotion of France under the theme French Month of May. The first artist was Steven Isserlis, a master cellist and the second was Yan Pascal Tortelier, conductor, son of famous cellist Paul Tortelier, under whom one of my Japanese friends Mr Sato studied the cello in Paris many years ago.


The evening started very very quietly when the HKPO whispered its way through the Scène d'amour Act 2 scene 3 (the Love Scene) of Berlioz's 1.5 hour long opera Opera Roméo et Juliette, followed by the more lively "chase" sequence in Act II scene 2, Scherzo: La reine Mab, reine des songes ( Queen Mab Scherzo) and  then finally the fairly explosive Roméo Seul (Romeo Alone) Grande fete chez Capulet. According to the Programme Notes, after Berlioz wrote the first two symphonies Symphonie fantastique and Harold en Italie, he started to write symphonies with voice parts and Paganini threw him a challenge of 20,000 franc two days after he heard the final movement of Harold en Italie to make Beethoven live again. Berlioz then started to work this symphony which he called a "Dramatic symphony after Shakespeare's tragedy Romeo and Juliet" after he saw the play in Paris on 15th Septmber, 1827 and when he introduced the work, he wrote "The very sublimity of this love made its depiction so dangerous for the musician that he had to give his imagination a freedom that sung words would not have provided, resorting instead to instrumental language which is richer, more varied, less precise and by its indefiniteness incomparably more powerful.".  In the Love Scene, we hear the part "le jardin de Capulet silencieux et deserte, Les jeune Capulets sortant de la fete en chantant des reminiscence de la musique du bal " where Romeo declared his love beneath the balcony of Capulet's house. We then heard the part called Queen Mab Scherzo, which Berlioz considered "virtually unplayable" by a large orchestra because of the extreme contrasts as it was so swift and delicate. But the HKPO did very well indeed. Then in Romeo Alone. his loneliness is depicted by the oboe solo, later overcome by the noise of the festivities at the Capulet's House. This scene is regarded by Berlioz as his favorite when he wrote his Memoire. He was impressed by the swift passion, "burning as lava, radiantly pure as an angel's voice, imperious, irresistible". It was a very programmatic music and Wagner was said to have learned much from the way Berlioz wrote this opera when the former used some of the techniques in his Tristan und Isolde in the same way that Berlioz learned from Beethoven.


Yan Pascal Tortelier studied under Nadia Boulanger at the Paris Conservatoire, then learned conducting from Franco Ferrara of Siena and became the chief conductor of the BBC Phiharmonic from 1992 to 2003 and is now its Conductor Laureate. He has also worked extensively with London Symphony, London Philharmonic, Ochestre de Paris, St. Petersburg Philharmonic, Oslo Philharmonic, Filarmonica della Scala Milan, the Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Baltimore and Pittsburg Symphonies, Montreal Symphony and the Philadelphia Orchestra and since March 2009 is the Principal Conductor of the Sáo Paulo Symphony. He is a tall man with silvery grey hair who conducts with great energy. As he moves the orchestra through the various sections of music, he would sometimes leave his feet over the edge of the rostrum, move his body up and down, and would sometimes jump backward and then suddenly lunge forward. Sometimes, he would conduct with just one hand, sometimes two. He holds his arms quite high as if he had got prongs for arms which he would dangle down according to need and would suddenly jab one of them forward to indicate the start of play of particular sections of the orchestra. His head would bob up and down and sway from side to side in quick motion with his frizzy grey white hair following slightly behind in time. It was a delight to watch all by itself.


The next piece of the evening was  a composition arranged by Sally Beamish (whose husband is a cellist) who got together various fragments done by Debussy and made of them a Suite pour violoncelle et Orchestre with the part of the cello played by Steven Isserlis, described in the Programme Notes as "acclaimed worldwide for his musicality and techniques, equally at home in chamber performances, recital or in concerts with the world's most prestigious orchestras and conductors.".  The piece was first premiered on 2nd March, 2007 by Steven Isserlis with the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra of Minnesota under Douglas Boyd. Only the Intermezzo and the Scherzo were orginally written by Debussy for the cello.  Beamish added three new movements from Debussy's early works, two of them being Danse Bohémienne and Reverie and the third being his Nuit d'étoiles.  I do not not know whether or not it is the style of famous cellists. His hairstyle bears remarkable similarity to another great cellist Maisky, sticking out as if he got radiating wire springs for hair. When he played, he would sway his head with great effort so we are treated to a spectacle of a bowed head with unruly hair swinging from side to side close to the bottom of the neck of the cello and almost hugging its strings. But he played with great finesse and delicacy and with a kind of sustained energy in pressing his bow across the strings which makes the music so alive, so filled with feeling and therefore so moving. He is a great cellist. He also recognized the great play from our lead cellist Richard Bamping and went specially over to shake his hand after he finished the piece. Isserlis got tremendous  applauses. He was so happy that he played two short "encores" for us.


The piece after the intermssion was Ravel's  La Valse. I have often heard this piece played by the piano but it is the first time that I heard the piece played by the orchestra. I learned from the Programme Notes that it was first a piece for two pianos which premiered in April 1920 which Ravel revised later for the orchestra. When it was so presented, it was called "a choreographic poem for orchestra." He described it thus: " Fantastic and fatal whirling clouds give glimpses, through rifts,of couples dancing. The clouds scatter, little by little. One sees an immense hall peopled with a twirling crowd. The scene is gradually illuminated. The light of the chandeliers bursts forth fortissimo.". I like this piece. It has some very colorful orchestration. Ravel is really a master of orchestration and sound effects. It fully captured the joy of movement and of the desire to live life to the full in the late 19th century Vienna, the most glorious part in the history of Austro-Hungarian Empire, when Vienna was confidently moving out from the Romantic period into a less aristrocratic and formal and yet cultured and freer form of middle class fun and revelry but what Ravel added to the waltz was a certain choppinesss, a certain dizzying pace, a certain metallic frenziness and  a certain verve from the brass section which the waltz normally does not have, especially towards its very very dramatic finale. The Vienna waltzes usually close with a slightly worked up recapture of its soft melodic main motif.  The applauses were long and enthusiastic. I think conductors do like to visit Hong Kong. We are so appreciative and so generous with our hand claps. I think that is only right. Good music should always be applauded.


13 則留言:

  1. Enjoy this piece of music!
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 08:07:00]Black Leopard,
    You're really fast, wonderful and so clever. I wouldn't know how to do all these uploading and transposition of stuffs to one's own website. I really must ask our office computer technician on how I can do that. It makes the writing so superflous except as introductions to seduce the reader to find out for themselves. Thank you so much.

    回覆刪除
  2. Also enjoy this piece of orchestration!

    回覆刪除
  3. Music sure dance along with one's imagination...
    Music flows, it also floats , it transcends itself...
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 08:22:00]Absolutely! With music, one' imagination soars. But at times, music can be so sad ! One hears the loss of energy, the wistfulness, the melancholy, the long hours of the sleepless nights, the desperate but ultimately disappointed hopes. Music moves our heart directly. Of all the arts, music moves fastest. Its effects are almost instantanteous. And with what power!

    回覆刪除
  4. If MUSIC be the food of love, give me excess of it! Have you guys been moved into tears by Music? I have, and the feeling is sublim
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 10:13:00]Of course. But only in private. We're men, aren't we? Big boys are not supposed to cry! Crying is for girls. That may be one of the principal reasons women usually live longer than men. Crying helps the human body release certain emotional toxins from their system. So cry as much as you want. Just make sure you're not seen!

    回覆刪除
  5. I usually listen to music in private. And when I listen, I put down everything, with eyes closed and let myself immerse in that private world of my own because visual image at that moment only interferes and has no place in the audio world. I don’t wipe away my tears but just let them dry by themselves. It’s a moment of catharsis, so serene and holy.
    By the way, good movies move me to tears too.
    You are right; we are boys and shouldn’t cry in the public. But I think boys’ tears are much bitterer and hotter. And strangely enough, I don’t like to see girls crying. I prefer to see them smile. Maybe tears should be shed in private regardless of gender.
     
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 12:50:00]I am different. Perhaps I am a visual man. When I listen to music, all kinds of pictures appear in my mind, the sun, the moon, the stars, seas, mountains, clouds, trees, flowers, dews clear as crystals, seas churning in storms, people in love, caressing, looking into each other's eyes, empty chairs, tables, beds, reminding them of happier times etc. people struggling against impossible odds and yet stubborning refusing to give up hoping for better times etc. Of course, good movies touch us to the depths of our souls too. But good directors know how to make use of music to enhance their images with composers like Ennio Morricone etc. Who likes to see others cry, boy or girls? But we can't control our tears. They have a will of their own!

    回覆刪除
  6. I think you have misinterpreted my message or maybe I have not expressed it aptly enough. When I say I listen to music with closed eyes, I mean I don’t want to look at all the physical objects around me (not even reading a book as some others are in the habit of doing). I close my eyes to “see” each and every image that the music conjures up, a world that embodies every imaginable sensation that the mind can experience, including those you have cited. That’s the moment when the audio world takes over and the physical world around me becomes irrelevant.
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 15:32:00]Oh, closed to the external theatre the better to focus on the mind's/the heart's own theatre! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa!

    回覆刪除
  7. Tears can also be for joy or happiness, haven't you shed a tear or 2 where you are elated with something? say, during graduation when they called out your name,  when you see someone you love in the airport after a long period of separation, or when you see your first born child . there are also times when you just cant stop laughing, tears come out from your eyes as well. and i think it is acceptable that guys can cry in public.   
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 15:37:00]The impossible beauty of the music of Chopin, Schubert, Schumann and Mahler are literal tear-jerkers. So are some of the Italian arias!

    回覆刪除
  8. When we are listening the classical music,  the best way for enjoyment is better closing our eyes.  Use our heart to feel the languages of music,  the emotional expression from different musical instruments tell us more and more feelings about the results of combination piece of music ...
    Tears of joy and sorrow bring from the listening,  I think it's good for us to response the emotion expressions from the musics.
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 23:37:00]Music is heard not by our ears, nor yet by our brain but by our heart. That's why we need to turn off our brain, which never ceases to analyze, to break down, to make distinctions, comparisons and to detect patterns. As you say, we allow our heart to float, to drown, to immerse itself upon the texture of the sounds, now from one instrument, now from another, in isolation or in combination. Curiously, the sounds themselves may have or suggest their own peculiar visual images through their melodies, their harmonies, their tempo, their force in waves upon waves of pure vibrations which somehow have their own structures which mimick or resonate with the  the movements of our hearts. We don't really understand how music moves us. All we know is that it does! Paradoxically, we can "hear" the music only when we cease to "listen" with our ears!

    回覆刪除
  9. I was also in the Saturday night concert and I was sitting at the fifth row of the balcony, the middle section. Mr. Chu was at the section left to mine. Did you sit next to him?
      Yes, all French programme, including the additional Ravel work for cello and orchestra encored. If my ear served, 12 Jun 2010 is a very special day to a lady, who has married someone for 40 years, announced by the conductor. The work, La   Valse, is played for her. Very romantic indeed. Yes, French, the conductor is.
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 22:59:00]Yes, you are absolutely right. It was the 40th anniversary of the conductor's wedding to his wife! I was sitting on the same row as Mr Chu, only at the 4th leftmost seat, next to a young European girl. What a small world!  I hear that your JBL 4344 is about to undergo a major revamping by Mr. Chu's young brother after he practically remade your Marantz 9!

    回覆刪除
  10. crying is natural
    guys may be you did not have a chance to see a charming girl cried beautifully before.
    i had this experience and it's beautiful, not annoying at all
     
    [版主回覆06/14/2010 23:21:00]In the eyes of a lover, whatever his love does takes on a most special charm. Lovers see everything through the magical mystique of their misty eyes. Love transforms. Love renders everything beautiful! Isn't that why people will seek love time and again, no matter how many times their hearts might have been broken in the past? They fall for love as a moth is drawn toward the flame. They can't help themselves. As the French would say: beauty is in the eyes of the beholder! And who are we to tell them that they might have seen things which are not "really" there?!

    回覆刪除
  11. I don’t have the privilege to own these prestige toys. The JBL 4344/Marantz 9 must be someone else. Mine are a pair of Avalon bookshelf driven by solid-state amplifier. I seldom listen to them in the past one year.
    [版主回覆06/15/2010 00:05:00]Yes, definitely a case of mistaken identity. Since you know Mr. Chu and he has a friend who also happens to be called Mr. Pak, I thought you might be who I thought you were. So sorry! Yet another trick my brain played on me!

    回覆刪除
  12. Because the musics are created by human being ...
    that's mean the human's emotions are within  the sound of musics,  the human being best used of all the music instruments to express human's imaginations and emotions ( not only the feeling inside our minds,  but also from the outside,  our surrounding areas ,  including the outerspace ... )
    [版主回覆06/15/2010 00:31:00]Music is definitely created by man. I cannot imagine music being created by animals, at least not the kind of "music" I have in mind. I am obtuse. I don't quite follow you when you say "human emotions are within the sound of musics". But whatever it is you mean, to me, composers do use musical instruments to mimick the flow of human emotions eg. rhythm of music follows the rhythm of human breathing( fast, slow to indicate being calm, agitated etc), the volume/loudness of music may be used to mimick the energy level of our emotions (how strong our feelings are); the frequency level (high, medium, low) may be used to mimick the level of our feelings (happy--high fast notes; sad: low and slow notes), change of key may be used to mimick change of moods etc; harmony may be used to corroborate. reinforce, emphasize through similarity of notes sharing certain higher harmonics in common with the fundamental tone of particular notes; motifs to emphasize repetition of certain emotions; different motifs to indicate different emotions rather like sub-plots in drama to emphasize particular aspects of the main plot or to highlight different treatment of the same subject/theme etc. . When you say that we use different instruments to express our emotions, I can understand you because different instruments do have their quite unique  musical "personalities/characters" and can thus be used to express different moods. But I am not quite sure what you mean when you say we use them to express feelings from outside. To me, the "outside" is simply there: it may not "have" any emotions except those we "attribute" to it eg. when we feel angry, we may think that Nature is angry with us and we subejctively "feel" that Nature too might be angry because there might be storms, lighting and thunder etc outside which we think "mirror" the storm brewing within our breast etc. I cannot understand your reference to "outerspace". Could you please explain?  

    回覆刪除
  13. I don't agree with you that animals do not create musics. You know,  the birds can sing ,  if you listen to them,  you can easily find out they have difference rhythm and has their own temperament.
    The composers  do use musical instruments to mimick the flow of human emotions ... (  Just like what my first response to you that the human's emotions are within  the sound of musics )
    The outside surrounding area,  e.g. the noise of people in the street,  the green plants and flowers on the countrysides,  the silence places,  the birds' songs ... all comes from what I meant outside surrounding area ... )
    And outerspace,  I meant the colours of the sky,  the rainstorm, the moon,  sun,  stars,  planets,  the galaxy ...
    [版主回覆06/15/2010 01:29:00]I see. You mean that there are naturally "musical" sound in Nature e.g songs of birds which are deliberately "created" for indicating the state of their well being, for indicating their readiness for mating or perhaps as signal of warnings of impending danger etc. to other birds. To me, these qualify only as natural sounds, not music, which to me is a cultural product specific to man and is an entirely artificial creation of the human brain who delight in the forms and textures of sound produced by different "instruments". Yours is a broad definition, mine is much  narrower and more specific. But it really matters little just so long as we understand what we mean when we use the relevant word. 
    Yes composers do use sounds of musical instrument to mimick the flow of our emotions.
    Natural sounds are sometimes incorporated into musical works, especially during the Romantic period eg. some conductors uses real cannon in the 1812 Overture of Tchaikovsky and George Gershwin made use of actual Paris taxi horns in his An American in Paris. Some people regard the rustling of tree leaves , the gurgling of water in streams  as musical. But that would be a metaphorical use of language.
    There is also something called synesthetics: some people do have the ability to "see" the "colour" of musical notes whilst others can translate the :"colours" of Nature into "musical sound". In either event, it is the structure of the "feeling" evoked inside us by different sensory mode (sight to sound or sound to sight) which makes such transformation/translation. transmutation" possible. 
    Thank you so much for sharing your point of view with me. One can always learn from others and learn especially how what we regard as one thing may be looked upon by others from a totally different angle and in a radically different  way. This is what makes life so very surprising and interesting. We live to be startled and surprised. How dull life would be without surprises!

    回覆刪除